The evolving visage of the male body in art

by Sezer Ali | MAY 8, 2025

ART & IDENTITY

ANATOMYOF DESIRE

A JOURNEY THROUGH HISTORY, PERCEPTION, AND THE EVOLVING ICONOGRAPHY OF MAN

For millennia, the sculpted body of the male form has exemplified ideas of beauty, power, and heroism throughout the Western creative heritage. From the sculpted deities of ancient Greece to Michelangelo's Renaissance David, artists have methodically depicted the male form, reflecting cultural ideals and aesthetic values. My initial experiences as a student at an art high school in Bulgaria, where the intensive study of plastic anatomy through the depiction of the human form was pivotal to our artistic growth, sparked a profound interest in the visual perception of the body and the messages it communicates as a form. During this period, I first encountered the depth and complexity of this subject through translated pieces in Bulgarian periodicals, particularly the profound work of Igor Semyonovich Kon on the male physique. Kon's viewpoint really influenced me, initiating a personal research venture that has culminated in this investigation.

This article will explore the intricate history of the male body as an artistic subject, examining its progression from idealized forms that represent cultural values ​​to more nuanced and varied depictions that contest conventional norms and reflect evolving societal perceptions of masculinity, sexuality, and gaze. Through a curated selection of artworks and artists—spanning different time periods, styles, and cultural contexts—the aim is not to present an exhaustive survey, but rather to highlight key examples that offer meaningful insight into the shifting iconography of the male figure. While many compelling works remain beyond the scope of this article, the choices included here seek to illuminate the broader trajectory and complexity of this enduring theme.

This examination will elucidate the lasting importance of the masculine form as a medium of artistic expression and cultural significance by scrutinising pivotal historical epochs and artistic movements in conjunction with contemporary viewpoints.

Karl Sterrer, Atlas
Karl Sterrer, Atlas

Fig. 1. Paul Cadmus, The Bath (c. 1951)., Fig. 2. Karl Sterrer, Atlas (date unknown)., Fig. 3. Evelyn De Morgan, Phosphorus and Hesperus (1882)., Fig. 4. Eugène Jansson, The Navy Bathhouse (1907)., Fig. 5. Aleksandr Deyneka, After the Battle (1944)., Fig. 6. Jean-Baptiste Frédéric Desmarais, Le Berger Pâris (18th century)., Fig. 7. Edvard Munch, Bathing Men (1907–1908)., Fig. 8. Camille Félix Bellanger, Abel (c. 1874)., Fig., 9. Yaroslav Sobol, Nude Male Model (date unknown).

Evelyn De Morgan, Phosphorus and Hesperus (1882)
Evelyn De Morgan, Phosphorus and Hesperus (1882)
Paul Cadmus, The Bath (c. 1951)
Paul Cadmus, The Bath (c. 1951)
Eugène Jansson, The Navy Bathhouse (1907)
Eugène Jansson, The Navy Bathhouse (1907)
Aleksandr Deyneka, After the Battle (1944)
Aleksandr Deyneka, After the Battle (1944)
Jean-Baptiste Frédéric Desmarais, Le Berger Pâris (18th century
Jean-Baptiste Frédéric Desmarais, Le Berger Pâris (18th century
Edvard Munch, Bathing Men (1907–1908
Edvard Munch, Bathing Men (1907–1908
Yaroslav Sobol, Nude Male Model
Yaroslav Sobol, Nude Male Model
Camille Félix Bellanger, Abel (c. 1874)
Camille Félix Bellanger, Abel (c. 1874)

IMAGES

Fig. 1. Paul Cadmus, The Bath (c. 1951).

Fig. 2. Karl Sterrer, Atlas (date unknown).

Fig. 3. Evelyn De Morgan, Phosphorus and Hesperus (1882).

Fig. 4. Eugène Jansson, The Navy Bathhouse (1907).

Fig. 5. Aleksandr Deyneka, After the Battle (1944).

Fig. 6. Jean-Baptiste Frédéric Desmarais, Le Berger Pâris (18th century).

Fig. 7. Edvard Munch, Bathing Men (1907–1908).

Fig. 8. Camille Félix Bellanger, Abel (c. 1874).

Fig. 9. Yaroslav Sobol, Nude Male Model (date unknown).